ECTIB: Applying the project collaboration toolkit – Apache North Sea, Subsea 7 & Quad

Apache North Sea, Subsea 7, Quad [Apache topsides team; PD&MS; QEDI; GEG]

1. Problem Statement

How to enhance delivery performance on the Callater Field Development Project to support project viability and business case in a low oil price environment.

2. Aims

  • Best in class safety and quality performance.
  • Project completion and ‘first oil’ within 24 months of field discovery.
  • Project cost performance at or below budget.

3. Method

  • Create a high performing, collaborative, project delivery team for efficient and effective project delivery.
  • Select known and trusted project delivery partners with predisposition to collaborative working.
  • Provide leadership, vision and boundaries of responsibility to allow project team members (the right people for the right role) to do what they do best.
  • Work with the ECITB Project Collaboration Toolkit retrospectively to evaluate and validate collaborative performance and to record outcomes and learnings from the collaborative experience for future benefit.

4.Impact

  • Fast project team ramp up with critical items of scope specified, ordered/ completed early.
  • Using partners with track record and known capability, formation of a lean, efficient project team that was focussed on delivery performance, with no role overlap and duplication.
  • Project delivered for a 10% reduction on approved cost budget.
  • A UKCS record for project schedule performance: 23 months only from field discovery to production.
  • Demonstration to the entire UK oil & gas sector of what can be achieved through effective project collaboration.

Total schedule time saved: Completed 5 weeks ahead of an aggressive schedule of 24 months to first oil

Total cost savings: 10% saving on approved project budget

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Atkins – Realising major savings through spares optimisation

1.Problem statement

Ever increasingly, operators are facing the challenge of managing their existing assets during volatile market conditions such that unnecessary financial ‘wastage’ is minimised and opportunities for increased efficiencies, and ultimately operating revenues, are maximised without compromising safety. Related to this, a further key challenge demands proactively positioning the business such that future operations are optimised to sustain improved efficiencies and financial return at minimal OPEX / investment, again, without compromising safety.

2. Aims 

Particular focus is demanded on minimising unnecessary and wasteful expenditures.  Such unnecessary spend can arise from many sources, but especially from inefficient inventory management. This includes excessive/unnecessary spares purchase, storage, etc.,  which can lead to extreme storage costs and avoidable, large scale capital expenditures, often of the order of £M’s. To combat this Atkins has developed a successful managed service that can help clients improve their inventory management, and overcome challenges including:

  • Excessive data handling issues – inadequate infrastructure/resource to deal with ‘Big Data’.
  • Inadequate corporate systems/processes to interrogate inventory stock types and levels.
  • Lack of coordination/communication between relevant internal groups and divisions.

Poor awareness of internal standards/practices (if they exist) leading to inconsistent implementation of maintenance strategies, R&M guidelines, etc. and quality related issues.

3. Method

Atkins service has three key elements:

  • Reducing waste by cleansing inventory data of unsuitable spares (obsolete, mothballed, degraded, perished, wrongly classified, etc.).
  • Increasing safety and availability by stocking the correct spares in the required condition, to mitigate critical failure, with focus on local operating context.
  • Reducing capital and operational costs by minimising excess stock, while managing stock-out risk to an acceptable level.

4. Impact

Following implementation of Atkins process on an operator’s range of assets, comprising offshore facilities, onshore terminals, and pipelines, the analysis revealed numerous inventory management inefficiencies, offering potential for significant waste reduction and reliability improvements.

For example:

  • An initial 29% of operational spares book value not linked to equipment – directing an investigation by the operator.
  • Errors in migration of inventory data when upgrading between CMMS versions.
  • Duplicate purchase orders.
  • Accounting data inconsistencies.
  • Inventory data fields not fit for purpose.
  • Surplus project spares from vendor spare parts interchangeability lists (SPIL) offloaded to operation regardless of suitability.
  • Scope for common spares pooling, promoting further excess stock savings.
  • Recording issues in free-text material descriptions – operator without physical metrics to get competitive quotes and reliant on overpriced spares from vendor SPILs.
  • Generic ‘repair versus replace’ response guidance not fit for purpose eg decision support logic not sufficiently nuanced for combinations of store and materials ownership and leasing.

Total savings anticipated

The analysis ultimately revealed $179 million of recommended savings constituting $79 million of unsuitable spares and $100 million of excess stock  – of this $49 million has been confirmed to date by client’s ongoing review.

“We achieved all three waves of disposals that needed to be accomplished, thanks to Atkins’ work, with savings of $49 million against the target $45 million for 2017, plus an extra $40 million already released to Material Management for producing Disposal Forms.”

Client’s project sponsor, Aug 2017

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Atkins – Maximising your Plant Capability using MeasCap

1. Problem Statement

In the oil and gas industry things don’t stand still. You may want to introduce new wells onto your facility, or rationalise your gas plant for declined production. Traditional capacity reviews work on one production profile case at a time, so become very time consuming and expensive when dealing with uncertainty and evaluating a number of options. Atkins’ MeasCap tool has been tailor-made to provide a more efficient approach to capacity assessment

2. Aims

For over 10 years, Atkins has been optimising our in-house software tool, MeasCap, to make facility capacity assessment:

  • Fast: automation allows hundreds of cases to be run/re-run in minutes
  • Extensive: multiple cases can be run simultaneously, allowing the full potential production envelope / field life to be assessed
  • Adaptable: easily incorporating late / future changes in data
  • Trustworthy: auditable, checkable, verifiable results
  • Results-focused: providing user with clear results and upgrade options

3. Method

Automated assessment of cases, which can be used to identify  capacity limitations, and then rerun to understand debottlenecking option effectiveness. The options are then assessed by our engineering team to understand constructability and cost implications, and option comparison. The flexibility offered by MeasCap allows late data to be incorporated, and the model can be re-used for future studies.

4. Impact

MeasCap has been used to help our clients assess a number of scenarios, including:

  • Third party tie-backs
  • Addition of new wells
  • Life of field studies
  • Low pressure operation options for maintaining export pressure
  • FPSO redeployment
  • Facility rationalization for late life
  • Terminal debottlenecking

The automation of cases makes the process far more efficient, and allows our  engineers to work with our clients to focus on assessing the “what if” questions. Clear results are presented which show the bottlenecks on the plant and feasible operating envelope, and display the range of opportunities available, with option payback vs investment cost.

Efficiency improvements

Automated capacity assessment gives double the results in half the time

Total savings anticipated

Typical study reduced from 12 to 6 weeks, saving > £30k

MeasCap has been used effectively on a broad range of offshore/onshore facilities, and was shortlisted for the IChemE Core Chemical Engineering Awards 2013

Submitted by Graham Filsell (Process Simulation Team Lead) 

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Atkins – Process Rationalisation to Reduce Costs in Late Life

Problem Statement

Facilities in late life no longer require their nameplate production capacities.

Retaining the process as designed can lead to unnecessary operational expenditure costs. In September 2017 an operator requested we use our proprietary tool MeasCap to assess their facility’s capacity and identify options to reduce cost.

Aims

  • Undertake external review of facility rationalisation to identify the most efficient means of processing the fluids
  • Identify process modifications to reduce operational expenditure (OPEX) while minimising capital expenditure spend.
  • Options must consider impact on availability and production capacity, and demonstrate financial impact
  • Focus on short-term, high impact areas which achieve quick results

Method

  • We quickly reviewed current overall capacity versus demand using Atkins’ proprietary MeasCap software, to identify areas of over/under utilisation.
  • We systematically identified options to remove excess capacity on a system and platform level, and used MeasCap to debottleneck equipment.
  • The best individual options were then combined to determine any additional benefits e.g. utility efficiencies.
  • Each option was conceptually assessed to understand OPEX savings and ability to meet target production in terms of capacity & availability with CAPEX for debottlenecking modifications estimated.
  • These financial implications were combined to give NPV per option to enable comparison, and develop the optimum rationalisation timeline.
  • Results were presented to the client management team and documented in the study report.

Impact

Multiple attractive options identified to reduce OPEX, minimise CAPEX and result in a positive NPV* – some examples below:

Option Impact on production CAPEX (US $) OPEX Saving/yr (US $) NPV ($)
Decommission Platform A Separation Train Sufficient capacity, reduced availability 7M 7M 36M
Smaller oil export pumps Sufficient capacity 15M 9M 39M
Decommission Platform A Power Gen 3M 1M 3M
Combined option 1 Sufficient capacity, reduced availability 18M 17M 43M
Combined option 2 26M 21M 22M

*NPV takes into account CAPEX, OPEX, lost production, availability impacts and discount factor

  • Use of MeasCap and Atkins expertise allowed an effective study of minimal duration – 6 week study costing ~ £50k.

Potential OPEX savings 

$15M – $20M / year

Savings using MeasCap 

~ 3 weeks quicker

~ £25k less

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Aker Solutions – Kaizen: PPE

1. Problem Statement

Needless over-issue of PPE Kits (316 duplicated kits issued to technicians in 2016)

2. Aims

  • To reduce the spend on initial issue PPE whilst ensuring individuals still receive PPE needed for their work prior to deployment offshore.

3. Method

  • Kaizen event that included the PPE supplier
  • Map current process and draw out issues causing overspend on PPE
  • Analyse the root causes to all the issues and identify their solutions
  • Build a detailed to-be process
  • Carry out the actions needed to run the new way of working
  • Track the benefits

4. Impact

  • Over-issue of kits reduced
  • 93% in 2017
  • 100% in the last 6 months
  • Despite a spike in recruitment with the up-man for a major hook-up contract.
  • Quantity of returned kits reduced
  • Measures implemented at minimal cost that makes the suppliers work easier (i.e. less expensive).
  • Benefits tracked for a year after and spend per person is still below target
  • Regular meetings with supplier set-up to ensure standard kit continues to contain best for purpose PPE.
  • 43% Cost avoidance during a major hook-up contract up-man

% cost avoided

43%

(Jun – Nov17)

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Aker Solutions – Kaizen: Subsea Electronics Module Top Cover

1. Problem Statement

High rate of quality failures for Subsea Electronics Modules Top Covers coming from the manufacturer

Multiple inductions;

• Unnecessary training (hundreds of people going through up to 9 days each);

• Multiple journeys during recruitment process.

2. Aims

•To drastically improve the quality of Top Covers coming from the manufacturer

3. Method

  • Kaizen event that included the manufacturer.
  • Mapping  of the recruitment process & issues identified;
  • Root causes of 200 issues and solutions developed
  •  Root causes of all the Quality issues identified
  • Solutions to Quality root causes developed, tested and embedded
  •  Solutions to Process issues developed and embedded
  • Communications plan for rollout to all stakeholders
    (300 people).

4. Impact

  • All quality issues at point of acceptance for Aker Solutions eliminated
  • (a 99% improvement reported between Dec 2016 and June 2017 and 100% improvement reported between March and June 2017)
  • Rework removed, lead time reduced, and need for test fit at point of receipt eliminated
  • (2 people, 1 hr for 10 top covers per month)

Quality Improvement

100%

Submitted by Darren Clyde, Senior Lean Coach, Aker Solutions

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Apollo and Oil & Gas Technology Centre partner on data

Problem Statement

Apollo were approached by a floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) contractor who required an integrated and comprehensive integrity management software solution for oil and gas.

Aims

  • Deliver operational efficiencies through digitising the offshore/on-site workforce.
  • Deliver significantly improved and efficient data management and work flow onshore
  • Improve the operational efficiency and quality of recording data at worksites through application of mobile and wireless technologies.

Method

  • After a number of early successful projects involving the migration of integrity data from legacy and uncontrolled sources Apollo KnowHow™ was created.
  • Apollo KnowHow™ is a modern, scalable, cloud-based data management software solution.
  • It brings significant data management and data quality benefits to engineers and other parties, whilst looking to future developments.

Impact

Apollo KnowHow™ is a step towards digitising the offshore worker and with the addition of optional modular add-ons, KnowHow™ will enable the distribution of electronic work packs, digital harvesting of integrity data along with real time reporting of data to the desktop of senior management, integrity managers and engineers, etc.

The ability of KnowHow™ to present data effectively, involve teams as appropriate, mirror engineering processes, provide work flow, audit trails, link to other systems (visualisation tools, document management systems etc.) ensures rapid close out of anomalies before they become larger problems.

Importantly, the design and architecture of KnowHow™ allows it to manage many sources of data effectively e.g. fabric maintenance work flow, pressure systems, Ex equipment, instrument tubing, trending, risk management etc.

Uniquely KnowHow™ allows operators an instant view of the integrity of their whole asset in real time.

Total hours saved 20%

Total savings anticipated £100k -£500k per asset, per annum

Fraser Graham, Business Development Executive

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Aker Solutions – Kaizen: 5S at Aker Solutions Portlethen Facility

Problem Statement

Excess materials and inventory, HSE issues due to
inventory and the need to hire another property to be
able to service a major contract.

Aim 

To improve the efficiency of the work carried out at the
Aker Solutions Portlethen facility.

Method 

• Map current process and draw out issues preventing the
flow of work through the facility.
• Map future lay out.
• Clear out excess inventory.
• Set-up standardised work areas.
• Reset factory for major contract and for flow
• Install lean tools such as tool shadowing, visual
management and Kanban.

Impact

New process ensured:
• Reduction in motion waste (approx 73% for the most frequent
job type).
• 8.5 tonnes removed – electrical, paperwork, scrap metal.
• £11k retrieved from scrapped items.
• 230m2 space freed-up for potential production bays.
• Potential 70% increase in production with introduction of new
bays.
• Cost avoidance – removing need for additional facility for
Mariner workload: £406K for per year, starting 2017.

The new process resulted in:
• Safer environment with 8.5tonnes of waste removed from site.
• Installed management walk rounds and time to reset and
improve during working day so changes are sustained
• Aker Solutions Portlethen is a more desirable place to work (an
interviewee after a facility tour).
• During a scheduled tour of the facility a customer was
impressed with how “in control” the facility was of production
for their contract.

Total cost avoided: £406k per annum

Contact: Darren Clyde, Senior Lean Coach

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Aker Solutions – Kaizen: Offshore and Site Recruitment

Problem Statement 

4,066 days lost due to missed mobilisation dates, caused by:
• Multiple inductions;
• Unnecessary training (hundreds of people going through up to
nine days each);
• Multiple journeys during recruitment process.

Aim

To improve the efficiency of the offshore and site
recruitment process.

Method

• Mapping of the recruitment process & issues identified;
• Root causes of 200 issues and solutions developed;
• Single, new recruitment process created;
• Supporting procedures created;
• Communications plan for roll out to all stakeholders
(300 people).

Impact

New process ensured:
• Removal of multiple inductions
• Removal of multiple medicals, if rehire or currently employed
• Combining medicals with inductions and training
• Removal of travel home, while awaiting Drugs & Alcohol (D&A)
test results (will be part of induction day, 2,3&4 combined)
• Removal of travel for D&A as a separate activity
• Removal of unnecessary training courses
• Removed unnecessary training (therefore travel)

The new process resulted in:
• 92.3% reduction in mobilisation days lost (219);
• Removal of unnecessary training (866 days);
• Value adding work 4306 days given back to the business.

Next steps
• Weekly KPI reporting to ensure improvements are sustained;
• Non-compliance addressed quickly.

Total time saved: 4306 days 

Contact: Darren Clyde, Senior Lean Coach

Click on the image above to download the case study.

Nexen deploys Predictive Analysis technology service

Problem Statement

It is widely acknowledged that a significant proportion of oil and gas production is lost each year through plant downtime and system-related issues.

Aims

  • Explore new technologies that make use of existing operational data sources to provide analytical insights which enable decisions and interventions to maximise production uptime, enhance business performance and mitigate risk.

Method

  • Nexen engaged Operational Excellence (OPEX) Group to apply a predictive analysis service on the Buzzard platform to detect warning signs and identify emergent system failures, prior to the event occurring.
  • The scope of work covered the full process gas compression system on board Buzzard, including process separators, coolers, exchangers, gas compressors, drivers, valves and system instrumentation.

Impact

The service has delivered significant value, including:

  • A reduction in critical system failures or downtime
  • Reduced maintenance costs and the high cost of unplanned equipment repairs
  • Identification of performance improvement opportunities
  • Highlighted rapidly escalating problems and longer term threats at a very early stage

Following the initial pilot in 2015, the service has been implemented on a longer-term basis on additional systems on Buzzard and other Nexen assets.

Total savings anticipated

$20 million production revenue safeguarded in 2016.

Click on the image above to download the case study.